Wednesday, May 6, 2009

This Day In Sports - May 6th

1997 -- Rick Pitino becomes head coach of the Boston Celtics.
1987 -- Mario Andretti sets the one-lap speed record at Indy at 218.204 MPH
1982 -- Seattle Mariner Gaylord Perry becomes the 15th pitcher to win 300 games.
1956 -- Cincinnati's Gus Bell homers off Bob Miller in both games of a double header.
1953 -- The Brown's Bobo Holloman no-hits the Philadelphia A's in his first major league start.


This will surely be a busy day in Minnesota Sports history as well...

A chat with Childress might determine if ex-Packer will play for Vikings. By Judd Zulgad and Chipp Scoggins (startribune.com)

Brett Favre in Vikings purple? The odds of that once unimaginable image could be getting better.

A source with knowledge of the situation confirmed Tuesday night that Vikings coach Brad Childress and Favre will meet at an undisclosed location later this week to discuss the possibility of the former Green Bay Packers great playing quarterback for Minnesota this season. ESPN first reported the story late Tuesday afternoon, crediting a source with direct knowledge of the discussions between the parties.

The ESPN report stated that there is a mutual understanding that sometime soon after the meeting, Favre will decide whether to sign with the Vikings and that Childress would expect him to participate fully in the offseason minicamps and training camps. Favre, who will turn 40 on Oct. 10, was never fond of participating in the Packers' offseason camps. The future Hall of Famer did not get traded to the New York Jets in time last year for that to become an issue.

One thing working in the Vikings' favor is that Favre is very familiar with the West Coast offensive system the team runs -- he directed the same offense for several years in Green Bay. He also is extremely close with former Packers assistant and current Vikings offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell.

Perhaps the Vikings' biggest concern will be the condition of Favre's injured right biceps tendon, which played a role in his struggles late last season when the Jets won only one of their final five games. ESPN reported that Favre might believe his arm can heal on its own without surgery, and how the injury heals will be a factor in his decision.

While it's not known where Childress and Favre will meet, Childress very well could make the trip to Hattiesburg, Miss., to talk at Favre's home. Vikings officials could not be reached to comment Tuesday, and Favre's agent, Bus Cook, did not return calls.


Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Frost/Nixon - Critical Review

Frost/Nixon - 2008
Plot: Following the resignation of US President Richard Nixon, television talk show host David Frost wants to arrange a series of interviews with him to air on television. Part of the reason Frost thinks the interviews would be compelling to both the public and the television networks is that Nixon never admitted any guilt of or offered any apology for the Watergate scandal which led to his resignation. Nixon, with a few interview offers on the table, ultimately agrees to Frost's proposal partly because of the high $600,000 guaranteed appearance fee, and partly because he wants to take command of such an interview to show the world that he is still presidential so that he can resurrect his political career. Nixon believes he can railroad Frost, who is better known as a pop cultural entertainment styled interviewer than an investigative political interviewer. However, Frost has every intention on these interviews being hard hitting and pointed; in addition to his producer John Birt, Frost hires two investigative reporters known for their previous exposés on Nixon: Bob Zelnick and James Reston Jr. Nixon's chief adviser for the interviews is his current chief of staff, Jack Brennan. Prior to the interviews, ground rules are negotiated, most importantly surrounding Watergate: the total percentage of time Watergate can be discussed and the definition of what constitutes Watergate. As the four interviews progress, each side tries to manipulate the interviews to his best advantage. Behind the scenes, Frost is having difficulty with the rest of his professional life: his regular talk shows are being canceled and he has not reached anywhere near the total $2 million financing for this project. Ultimately, Frost has to finance the project with much money out of his own pocket. It isn't until a chance telephone call that the tides turn on the interviews. Written by Huggo (imdb.com)

Review: *This review contains minor spoilers* I am realizing that I really enjoy watching Hollywood theatrical version of real life events that happened either while I was a young child or before I was born. Growing up in the United States I am familiar with the main premise of Watergate and know that Richard Nixon was the only president ever to resign from office. This film takes place in 1977, just after Nixon had resigned from his second term as President. Again, with this being a subject that I was not all that familiar with I went into it with a wide open mind and eagerness to learn more about this situation. With the mistakes that Nixon had made the country was in a flux and wanted to hear what Nixon had to say of himself. David Frost (Michael Sheen) was the man for the job. The acting in this movie was above average. Sheen depicted the 70's version of Ryan Seacrest wonderfully. Watching his transition from treating this opportunity with the former president as just another business venture to actually investing himself into these interviews and having a goal and a purpose was fantastic. It was very clear to the viewing audience that while Nixon and Frost were having their late night phone call a light bulb turned on for David Frost and Sheen presented this turning point very well. All this talk about the acting and I haven't even touched on the performance of Frank Langella. Langella played Richard Nixon and was nominated for Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role. From what I know and what I have heard, his depiction of Richard Nixon was spot on. Both Sheen and Langella had a little extra practice in their roles as they both starred in the "stage version" of Peter Morgan's Frost/Nixon.

The movie itself was pretty slow for the first two thirds of its run time, but the way that it got heated in the final third made the wait worth it. Up until this point in the film Richard Nixon had completely been painted as an egotistical criminal. While his opposition was attempting to "give Nixon the trial he never had" we saw Nixon attempting to turn the tables on them and basically benefit from these interviews which were supposed to condemn him. Then came the late night phone call. A political drunk dial between Nixon and Frost which seemingly lit a bit of a fire under the backside of David Frost. Through rigorous research and late night work, Frost was able to turn the tables on the former president in the final taping of the feature length interview. This was the moment in the movie where everything turned and flipped upside down. Not only did Frost unveil to the world that Nixon had made some grievous mistakes, but he unveiled this truth to Richard Nixon himself. Langella's representation of this revelation also flipped my emotions and made me feel bad for the position that the former president had found himself in. This type of jaw dropping moment is what keeps people returning to the theater. To think and realize that this was a true story and that this all really happened has made me very interested in finding tape of the actual interview.

This movie was a little slow in coming together, but once it was all set up and the bomb dropped it was definitely worth the time. I would recommend this movie for a rental from your local Blockbuster but I personally would not go out of my way to purchase a copy for myself. I have rated this film 3 out of 5 stars.

Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

Milk - Critical Review

Milk (2008)

Plot: Upon moving to San Francisco from New York City in 1972, forty year old Harvey Milk gains focus in his life as a gay activist in the city's Castro district. Gay rights activism turns to political activism as Milk decides he can be a more effective voice for the gay community as a politician, elected or not. Through several elections and losses both for a city seat and a state assembly seat, Milk becomes the first openly gay man in the United States to be elected to political office when he wins a San Francisco supervisor seat in 1977. His many political battlefronts include one with the national anti-gay Save the Children crusade, led and fronted by singer Anita Bryant. Closer to home, Milk has a continuing struggle with his fellow supervisor, Dan White, a staunch social conservative. Written by Huggo (imdb.com)

Review: *This review may contain minor spoilers* This movie came to me highly recommended by a few friends of mine. The story of Harvey Milk, was a story that I was completely unfamiliar with before watching this movie. Basically all I knew about it was what I had heard in the news when the film was first released. I knew that Sean Penn beat out Mickey Rourke, Frank Langella, Brad Pitt, and Richard Jenkins to win an Oscar for his performance as Harvey Milk. It was also in the running for best motion picture of the year (fell short as Slumdog Millionaire stole the show). But I still had some reservations since past experiences have reminded me that the so called "critics" and I don't completely agree on what makes a good movie. So with a moderate level of hesitance we went ahead with it. The story in this movie, all be it a true story, was very well written and adjusted to fit the big screen. Let's face it, we all know that there were some parts of the story that were glorified or over exaggerated to add a little drama to the movie. Yet it was very tastefully done. In doing a little research on the side, the writers wonderfully highlighted the points in Harvey's life that made him into the face of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LBGT) community. It still amazes me how a movie crew can take a busy area of San Francisco and successfully shut it down and take it back to the way that it was in the 1970's. The set design and costume crew did a wonderful job. With this being a true story there are pictures and real life accounts of these characters to look back on and compare to make the movie as accurate as possible. This DVD had a feature that I love and think that all nonfictional movies should have. Right before the credits as the captions were explaining more information about the characters. These were accompanied with pictures which they transitioned from the actors depictions of the characters to photos of the real life people. I was astounded at how much of a resemblance there was between the actors all made up and the actual people. A true tribute to the casting, makeup, and costume crews.

Looking beyond the surface of the film this was a very deep and controversial issue back in the 1970's and this look behind the scenes of the Milk campaign and the struggle of those who made Castro their home really tugged at my heart. I know that this is a very bold comparison to make but during these trying times in our countries history, but Harvey Milk was the closest thing the LGBT community had to Martin Luther King Jr. During this time the citizens of Castro were experiencing the hatred of those that did not have the same beliefs as them. Most of the country had turned against them, the police had turned against them, and Anita Bryant was heading up the charge against the LGBT community. The one bright spot in the lining was Harvey Milk. To see the struggles that he himself went through facing the hatred of the nation and losing friends who could no longer take it really opened my eyes to how hateful and awful humans can sometimes be. This movie went beyond the theater, it carries a feeling of hope for our nation. A hope that someday there will be no more hate. It challenges us all to look past a person's sexual orientation and see them as the human being that they truly are.

I would highly recommend this movie to everybody. It is a very entertaining and well put together film. Along with entertaining the audience it raises awareness on a subject that even in 2009 is still a touchy subject with most of our nation. I have given this film 3.5 stars out of 5 and a high recommendation for anybody interested.

Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

This Day In Sports - May 5th

1989 -- Officials issue Mike Tyson a second speeding ticket for drag racing in Albany, New York.
1981 -- The Mets beat the Yankees in the 16th and final Mayor's Trophy Game, gaining the 8-7-1 all-time series edge.
1978 -- Cincinnati's Pete Rose becomes the 14th player in baseball history to record 3,000 hits.
1955 -- "Damn Yankees" opens in New York City, starting a run of 1,022 performances.
1938 -- Phillies pitcher Harold Kelleher faces 16 Cubs batters in sixth inning, allowing 12 runs.
*From SI.com

Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

Monday, May 4, 2009

The Wrestler - Critical Review

The Wrestler (2008)
Plot: Back in the late '80s, Randy "The Ram" Robinson (Mickey Rourke) was a headlining professional wrestler. Now, twenty years later, he ekes out a living performing for handfuls of die hard wrestling fans in high school gyms and community centers around New Jersey.

Estranged from his daughter (Evan Rachel Wood) and unable to sustain any real relationships, Randy lives for the thrill of the show and the adoration of his fans. However, a heart attack forces him into retirement. As his sense of identity starts to slip away, he begins to evaluate the state of his life -- trying to reconnect with his daughter, and striking up a blossoming romance with an exotic dancer (Marisa Tomei) who is ready to start a new life. Yet all this cannot compare to the allure of the ring and passion for his art, which threatens to pull Randy "The Ram" back into his world of wrestling.(imdb.com)

Review: *This review may contain minor spoilers* Growing up as a young boy in America there is no avoiding the phase of your life where professional wrestling is top priority in your entertainment world. For me it was during the sixth grade when WCW and WWF temporarily jumped ahead of the Minnesota Twins and Boy Meets World. The Wrestler takes you on a behind the scenes adventure into the life of wrestlers. Set in the late 80's this film follows Randy "The Ram" Robinson through the ups and downs of his career. The film took on an interesting twist when you learn that Mickey Rourke's acting career has followed a eerily similar rise and fall. Like Randy I wish that we could fly back to the 80s sometimes. The music, the vehicles, and the overall attitude that Randy loved was reflected in this movie. Props go out to the team that was in charge of setting the scene and getting costumes, buildings, vehicles etc together in hope to create a fairly accurate setting for the movie.

I wish that I knew a little more about where the writer (Robert D. Siegel) got the idea for this story. To take a look at this behind the scenes point of view on the career of a professional wrestler was very interesting. Earlier in his career Randy had found great fame and is now performing in much smaller venues but still riding the fame from his heyday. Remembering the rush from hearing the fans shouting his name has caused Randy to push his body to extreme measures in order to make a return to the top. There must have been some sort of inspiration from an actual wrestler that lead to this premise as many real life professional wrestlers seem to hang on as long as they can as well. But the story alone would not have been the same without the hard work and extreme lengths that Mickey Rourke went to to accurately portray his character. It seems as if Rourke was aware that this was potentially his last chance at rejuvenating his acting career. To make this role as realistic as possibly Rourke said that he did, "Almost, everything that actual wrestlers do." He worked himself back into shape, jumped from the turnbuckle, cut himself for the show, and by many accounts he even roided up to get the maximum amount of muscle, all of which came across brilliantly on the screen. Along side Rourke was Marissa Tomei (Cassidy) whose exotic dancing career was coming to an end as her age began to catch up with her. The casting and character development throughout this movie really added to the overall affect it had on its viewers. The correlation between the situations that these two characters find themselves in is what makes their relationship so captivating on the screen.

This movie was a little graphic for my taste but was a fantastic story. I would highly recommend this movie for adults and feel as if everybody can find something to relate to in this film. I have rated this film 4 out of 5 stars. If you are interested in learning more about this movie, click here to view the trailer.


Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

The Reader - Critical Review


The Reader (2009)
Plot: Post-WWII Germany: Nearly a decade after his affair with an older woman came to a mysterious end, law student Michael Berg re-encounters his former lover as she defends herself in a war-crime trial (imdb.com).

Review: **This review contains minor spoilers** Nominated for five Oscars and winner of one, The Reader came with high hopes and highly acclaimed. We knew about five minutes into the film that it was not necessarily going to be "our type" of movie, but we continued on anyways. Starring Kate Winslet and Ralph Fiennes, this film was filled with dramatic moments and very interesting cinematography. I really enjoyed the way that the film was filmed. The style of director Stephen Daldry was filled with vibrant color during the light hearted scenes and riddled with soft tones for the dreary moments. Being set towards the end of World War II it was very interesting to see some of the dilemmas and opportunities that faced the normal everyday citizens of Hitler's Germany. Even for those that were living in the smaller countryside towns, the intrigue of the plan that Hitler was disclosing to the German citizens seemed grand. This uncommon point of view during WWII made the film very interesting.

The overall story was a little sketch if you ask me. I'm not sure how I feel about a random women on the street hooking up and having an affair with a 15 year old boy that she barely knows. I guess times were tough for everybody and who am I too critique clouded judgement? But even once I got beyond this idea the remaining premise of the movie failed to wrap me up in the story. There were points where characters had a chance to go beyond their physical feelings towards someone and do what was morally right and failed to do so. The main male character had the opportunity to keep the woman out of jail by proving that she was illiterate thus could not have filed a report for the concentration camp, yet he did nothing. He went to visit her in jail, then tucked his tail betwixt his legs and ran out. Needless to say the Michael Berg was not one of my favorite characters in the history of cinema. How he carried on an affair at the age of 15 for a matter of months without his family catching on is beyond me. It's obvious that they were not happy with him for some reason, but from the very beginning of the movie the whole Berg family dynamic was uncomfortable and weird. The one bright spot in this film was the acting. Kate Winslet, David Kross (young Michael Berg), and Ralph Fiennes (Michael Berg) did a remarkable job portraying a few uncomfortable roles. Kate Winslett won an Oscar (Best Actress) for her portrayal of a lonely Nazi camp coordinator in the midst of an affair with a teenager. During her acceptance speech she summed it up wonderfully when she said that this was the hardest role she's ever had because there was nothing within the character that she could relate to. She had no experience to pull from to get into character. This is so true, and for that, kudos to you Kate!

All in all the movie is worth a redbox $1 rent . *Disclaimer* there is a high amount of nudity in this film so keep that in mind when considering the rent. I have no desire to own this movie, but do not feel that I wasted my time in watching it. I have rated it 2.5 stars out of 5.

Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

This Day In Sports - May 4th

1965 -- Willie Mays hits his 512th home run, breaking Mel Ott's NL record.
1975 -- Houston's Bob Watson scores baseball's one-millionth run of all time.
1984 -- Dave Kingman's fly ball never comes down, as it lodges in the Metrodome ceiling.
1990 -- Oriole reliever Gregg Olson sets relief pitcher record by pitching 41 consecutive scoreless innings.
1991 -- Indians' Chris James sets club record for most RBIs in a game with nine.
*From SI.com

"Oh that treacherous Metrodome Roof!"

Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

Sunday, May 3, 2009

LOST - Daniel Faraday's "Theory of Relativistic Physics"

Background Information
In one of previous posts I mentioned a theory that I stumbled across concerning the names of the characters on the show. The producers have told us that a lot of thought went into the specific names for each of the characters. So far we there has been nothing that holds a whole lot of significance regarding the names, so something has to be coming in the future. In this post I talked about an idea that someone in one of the message boards I frequent had mentioned that most of the names on the show can be split into two different groups, Deists and Christians (You can CLICK HERE to view my previous post containing this list and more information on the two sides). With the introduction of Bran and Ilana this season we have been reminded that there is a war coming to the island and it seems to be looming in the near future. With this in mind I decided to go back and do a little research regarding these two sides of Deists and Christians.


DEISM -
(n) The belief, based solely on reason, in a God who created the universe and then abandoned it, assuming no control over life, exerting no influence on natural phenomena, and giving no supernatural revelation. (NOTE - A deist, as denying a revelation, is opposed to a Christian).
This list that I refer to compares the names of people on the show and real life well known Deists. These are a few of the characters that would fall on this side of the battle. John Locke, Kate Austen, Hugo Reyes, James "Sawyer" Ford, Walt Lloyd, Danielle Rousseau, Ethan, Charles Widmore, Desmond Hume, Richard Alpert, Charlie Pace.

CHRISTIAN - (n) a person who believes in Jesus Christ; adherent of Christianity. Here is a list of people that would fall on this team. Jack Shephard, Christian Shephard, Aaron Littleton, Claire Littleton, Benjamin Linus, Jacob, Abbadon, Charlotte Lewis, Daniel Faraday, Michael Dawson.

Looking at these teams there were two things that stuck out to me as a little strange. First off, how could the crash surviving Losties turn on each other? It would be tough for me to see Hugo and Hack fighting on two different sides. Secondly, a handful of these characters are dead and out of the picture, so how could they have any significance? This brings us to Daniel Faraday's Theory of Relativistic Physics.

Daniel Faraday's "Theory of Relativistic Physics"
In our last episode, episode 5.14 The Variable, we came to a point where Jack, Kate, and Daniel were heading into the jungle to find the Others and Daniel spilled his guts and unfurled his master plan for saving the Losties and getting them back to present time. Daniel said that he had studied Relativistic Physics his entire life and that he thought that if he could find the H-bomb that he helped the Others bury years before, he could detonate it near the Swan station, negate the electromagnetic activity that is happening under the station and prevent "the incident" from ever happening. The Theory of Relativity, or Daniel's Relativistic Physics, basically states that by changing something along the line, future occurrences will then be changed or affected by the initial variation on the path. In the realm of LOST this means that by preventing "the incident" from happening, Daniel thinks that he will then be able to prevent Oceanic flight 815 from crashing on the island in 2004 (since the hatch would never have been built) and also prevent the freighter from ever being sent to the island by Charles Widmore. Sending all the Losties and everyone on the island on a different path for the future. Following this line of reasoning, this could mean that other events post September 22, 2004 (LOST time) could have changed as well. Most importantly it could reverse the deaths of Charlie, Ethan, Abbadon, Nikki, Paulo, Boone, Shannon, Alex, Rousseau, Keamy, Goodwin, Michael, Libby, Ana Lucia, and Mr. Eko. If this turns out to be the case it would warrant the possibility that the two sides of the battle listed above, could find themselves fully intact again! So maybe "Dead Isn't Dead" after all! If this crazy theory turns out to be true we could find ourselves with a season 6 "War" with the likes of Charlie Pace, Ethan, and John Locke facing off against Christian Shephard, Jacob, and Charlotte!

"Theory of Relativistic Physics For Dummies"
If the above paragraph did not make any sense for you I've dumbed it down a little bit to highlight the important ideas. Basically, if Daniel, or now that he has died Kate and Jack, succeed in getting the bomb to blow up the Swan construction site, they would fully avoid "the incident," the crash of Oceanic flight 815, and the Freighter from ever being sent to the island. Reversing many things that we have seen thus far on the show. Season six could be riddled with a war between characters which could include the previously deceased characters! (Charlie, Rousseau, Ethan, etc.)

So what do you think?

I know that this theory is a little "out there," but it makes enough sense to be considered. Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic/theory. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

Friday, May 1, 2009

LOST 014 | The Variable - Episode Recap

LOST 014 | The Variable - Episode Recap
After another two week wait LOST returned this week. The previously on LOST portion at the beginning was loaded with Daniel Faraday, Charles Widmore, and Eloise Hawking. Sounds like a good episode to me! Let the recap begin! **If you have not watched episode 5.14, The Variable, DO NOT READ THIS POST, It contains spoilers!







Off the Island
We start this week off the island and pick up right after Ben Linus shot Desmond. Penny and Charlie are in the waiting room at the hospital when Penny is approached by Eloise Hawking. After a little conversation, Eloise tells Penny that her son is Daniel Faraday. Remember that while Daniel was skipping through time he stopped at the hatch and told Desmond that he had to find his mother. Desmond then woke up in the middle of the night with a newly remembered memory of this encounter with Daniel. We then begin running through a series of flashbacks that document the childhood and life of Daniel Faraday. In the first scene we see young Daniel Faraday playing the piano when a distraught, middle aged Eloise Hawking comes around the corner and tells Daniel that he no longer has time to play the piano. She asks if he knows what "destiny" is and tells him that he has a special gift that must be nurtured. Daniel's gift is his mind, and she tells him that it is her "job" to keep him on his path and he can no longer play the piano. Daniel responds by saying something very interesting, "I can make time."

We then jump ahead to Daniel's graduation from his program at Oxford. He introduces his girlfriend Theresa to his mother, who at this point is all business. If you remember from episode 5.03, Jughead, Theresa Spencer was Daniel's girlfriend, lab assistant, and test subject. In Jughead, Desmond was on a search to find Eloise and was directed to an address where he met Theresa. At this time she was in a state of hospice, bed ridden and motionless. The nurse told Desmond that Daniel tested his experiment on her and she's been that way ever since. Back to The Variable. Daniel sits down to join his mother for lunch, Eloise did not include Theresa and continued insisting that Daniel should focus on his work. Frustrated with his mother Daniel spits out that he received a 1.5 million pound research grant from some industrialist named Charles Widmore. Eloise presented Daniel with a gift and walked away from the table wishing him luck. The gift turns out to be Daniel's journal that we have seen him performing equations in. On the inside cover Eloise had written, "Daniel, No matter what, remember, I will always love you. Mother"

Jumping forward to 2004 we see Daniel sitting in front of the TV crying as the news is reporting that searchers had found the wreckage of Oceanic flight 815. There was a knock at the door and Charles Widmore rolls in. Daniel does not remember him and admits that he now has a condition that affects his memory. As Charles sits down he moves a comic book, on the cover of the comic book is a statement regarding time travel. Daniel tells Charles that he tested his experiments on himself before Theresa. Widmore tells Daniel that the plane crash on TV was indeed staged by him and the people on the plane are still alive. They are on an island, a "special island, with unique scientific properties." He says that the island will further his research, show him things he'd never dreamed of, and it would heal his memory. Daniel says that Charles sounds like his mother, and Widmore responds by saying, "that's because you mother and I are old friends." Jump forward a few days and we see Daniel at the piano again, this time struggling to play. She has learned of the job offer the Widmore gave to Daniel and she told him that it was very important that he accept the offer from Mr. Widmore. To end our off the island festivities we again flash back to a confused Penny who is trying to piece the puzzle of Eloise and Daniel Faraday together. She admits that Desmond has become a casualty in something that is far bigger than he. She admits that "for the first time in a long time [she doesn't] know what's going to happen next." The nurse comes out and alerts Penny that Desmond will be just fine and is requesting her. Penny goes to see Des and Eloise exits the hospital only to be approached by none other than Charles Widmore. After the two of them sass back and forth a while Charles states that Daniel IS HIS SON! She slaps him and walks away.

On The Island
We start off where we left off in episode 5.13, Some Like It Hoth. Miles and Daniel discuss why Daniel returned. Daniel has returned to figure out how and why Jack, Kate, and Hurley got back to the island and back to 1977. Daniel storms off and wakes Jack up. Jack tells Dan that his mother was the one who talked them into returning to the island. We saw this in episode 5.06. 316. Daniel tells Jack and Hurley that his mother was wrong and they do not belong in 1977 at all. Daniel and Miles hop in a jeep and head out to the Orchid station to find Dr. Chang. Jack then slips off to alert Sawyer that Faraday is back. Sawyer and Juliet are still trying to figure out what to do with Phil, whom Sawyer knocked out in episode 5.13, Some Like it Hoth. Daniel sneaks down into the construction site and we are promptly taken directly back to the scene that opened this season with Daniel down in the depths of the Orchid. Daniel approaches Dr. Chang and tells him that everybody needs to evacuate the island because the electromagnetic activity at the Swan station. He ends this conversation by telling Chang that he and Doc Brown drove the Delorian to the island and that they are "from the future." Obviously Chang does not believe him and Dan alerts Dr. Chang that Miles is his son. A confused Chang turns to Miles and asks him to verify, Miles denies it and Changs dips on the kid from the future. Interesting sidenote, during this whole altercation you could hear some whisping in the background that sounded like it could have been the smoke monster? It also could have been the running engine from the Dharma van that was waiting for Chang. Miles looks at Daniel like he's nuts, and asks him why he almost gave them away? Daniel tells Miles that he's trying to get his "father to do what he is supposed to do."

At this time Sawyer has gathered the remaining Losties at his pad and he lays out the situation regarding Phil. He throws out two options. Option A.) steal the sub and head off the island. Option B.) head into the jungle and start from square one. Jin and Hurley don't see the sense in heading off the island after all they did to try and get back. Daniel and Miles return and head to Sawyer's place where Daniel begins to explain himself. Daniel is looking for the hostiles, in particular his mother, Ellie. Daniel reminds some of them that they met her back in 1954. This was the first time that Jack, Kate, and Hurley have heard anything about the time skipping that Sawyer and his gang experienced back in 2004. Sawyer calls Kate Freckles and Juliet mails it in telling Kate she should take Daniel because "it's over here for us." While they are heading to the car, Daniel peels off and approaches a childhood Charlotte who is swinging on the play set. While Charlotte was dying in episode 5.05, This Place is Death, and adult Charlotte tells Daniel that she remembers him coming to her and telling her to leave when she was a child. While Daniel, Kate, and Jack are grabbing some guns from the motor pool, Radzinksy and his boys roll up on them and a naive Daniel exposes that he has a weapon in his hand, GUNFIGHT! Radzinsky shoots Daniel and people start shooting all over the place. While in the midst of the gunfight, Jack, Kate, and Daniel escape in a jeep and roll off into the jungle towards the sonar fence and ultimately "the Others."

While Jack is inspecting Daniel's wounds Faraday admits that his theories have changed and anyone of them can die in 1977 and cease to exist actual present time. We flash away to Sawyer and Kate as they are packing and getting ready to head into the jungle. Radzinsky busts into Sawyer's home and tells him that the new recruits have infiltrated the camp. Phil starts banging in the closet and Radzinsky and his boys take Sawyer and Juliet hostage. Flash back to Faraday's crew tromping through the jungle. Daniel decides that it's time to level with Jack and expose his genius plan. Turns out that Daniel's plan is to find the Hydrogen bomb from episode 5.03, Jughead, and "change the past." He tells them that they themselves are "the variables" and that they can change their destiny. By blowing up the bomb Daniel thinks that he can't negate the electromagnetic energy below the hatch or the Swan station. If he succeeds in this, the hatch will never be built and Oceanic flight 815 will never crash on the island, essen-tially Daniel is attempting to alter the future (I have an interesting theory on this that I will post in the next few days). The gang finally finds the camp where "the Others" are staying and he goes gung-hoe into the middle of the camp demanding to speak to Eloise. Richard tells Daniel that Eloise is not here. Daniel tells Richard that he wants to know where the bomb is and gives him three seconds...one...two...BANG! A gun goes off. Daniel looks down and he has been shot in the chest. Camera cuts to the side and we see the middle aged Eloise Hawking was the shooter. While lying on the ground Daniels realizes that his mother shot him and says, "You always knew. You knew this was going to happen and you sent me here anyway. I'm your son." THUMP, LOST ending screen comes on and as we know, from yesterday's post, Daniel Faraday is dead.

Please, if you are interested I encourage you to participate and share your thoughts. I would love to get some feedback and hear what each of you took from the day's topic. Just fill in the comment box at the end of each blog and let me know what you think! To read more posts and see my entire blog click the Touch 'Em All Productions header at the top of the page!

This Day In Sports - May 1st

1906 -- Phillies' John Lush no-hits Brooklyn Dodgers, 6-0.
1920 -- Brooklyn Dodgers tie Boston Braves, 1-1, in 26 innings.
1940 -- The 1940 Olympics are cancelled.
1969 -- Leonard Tose buys Philadelphia Eagles for $16,155,000.
1992 -- L.A. Dodgers postpone three games due to racial riots over Rodney King.
*From SI.com